Difference between Direct Agreement and Collateral Warranty


Direct agreement and collateral warranty are two terms that are often used interchangeably but have different meanings in the context of contract law. As a professional, it is important to understand the difference between these two terms, especially when working with legal documents.

Direct Agreement

A direct agreement is a legally binding agreement between two parties that provides for the obligations and rights of one party to be directly enforceable against the other party. A direct agreement is usually entered into between a lender and a borrower, where the borrower`s obligations and rights under a loan agreement are directly enforceable against the lender.

In the context of construction law, a direct agreement is often entered into between the main contractor and the funder of a construction project, such as a bank or a building society. The purpose of the direct agreement is to ensure that the funder has direct access to the contractor in the event of a default by the borrower. This enables the funder to step in and complete the project without delay, thereby protecting its investment.

Collateral Warranty

A collateral warranty is a legally binding agreement that creates a contractual relationship between two parties who are not parties to the original contract. A collateral warranty is usually entered into between a third party and the employer or the main contractor of a construction project. The purpose of the collateral warranty is to provide a mechanism for the third party to claim against the employer or the main contractor in the event of a breach of contract.

For example, a collateral warranty may be entered into between a sub-contractor and the employer or the main contractor of a construction project. The purpose of the collateral warranty is to provide the sub-contractor with a contractual relationship with the employer or the main contractor, which enables the sub-contractor to claim against them in the event of a breach of contract.

Key Differences

The key difference between direct agreement and collateral warranty is that a direct agreement creates a direct contractual relationship between two parties who are already parties to the original contract, while a collateral warranty creates a contractual relationship between two parties who are not parties to the original contract.

Another difference is that a direct agreement provides for the direct enforcement of obligations and rights under the original contract, while a collateral warranty provides for the indirect enforcement of obligations and rights under the original contract.

In summary, direct agreement and collateral warranty are two terms that are often used interchangeably but have different meanings in the context of contract law. As a professional, it is important to understand the difference between these two terms when working with legal documents.